Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)

Hm, I'm getting a little concerned about the direction here. This thread shows at least three people who agreed that it would be beneficial to only define the inSeries property and leave out hasSeriesMember or whatever, because it makes it difficult to determine membership in a series programmatically, since one doesn't know in advance which approach is taken in the metadata. Yet we have people saying they see no reason not to include both, the draft includes both, and there is ongoing discussion of what to call the second term. Next, I expect someone will say that we should just go with it this way and see if anyone outside the group comments, nobody will comment, and we will be stuck with something that doesn't reflect what most of us want, or at least a process that doesn't address the issue raised.

GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 21:50:28 UTC