Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)

Regarding the `hasSeriesMember` and `inSeries`, the way it is defined now it always connects an instance of dataset series to an instance of the dataset. However, the dataset series may have a hierarchical nature, with a different kind of series on each level, e.g. the top-level series is split according to topical facets, the next level according to geographical division, and the lowest level according to temporal division.

The bottom line is that I think that the range of `hasSeriesMember` and the domain of `inSeries` should allow the users to use both Datasets and Dataset Series.

We can already see this in the Czech catalog:
- [Top level dataset series](é-sady/00006947/833106130/c4ad2c2eb48baea04b67600e907b45aa), grouping datasets coming from a single IT system
- [Middle level dataset series](é-sady/00006947/833106130/a77f25e1dfee2b3ec4be09f02c5fc197) representing a part of the IT system
- [Specific dataset at the bottom of the hierarchy](é-sady/00006947/833106130/a77f25e1dfee2b3ec4be09f02c5fc197)

GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Monday, 15 March 2021 06:04:45 UTC