- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:31:24 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> I would then go further and propose (in the same way) for having `dcat:hasCatalogMember` and `dcat:inCatalog` for the relationships between the `dcat:Catalog` and the `dcat:DatasetSeries`. Thanks for the comment, @riannella: `dcat:catalog` is already used in existing implementations, as it was defined in DCAT 2. Moreover, it follows the same name convention of `dcat:dataset`, `dcat:distribution`, `dcat:record` defined in DCAT 1, and `dcat:service` defined in DCAT 2. I am afraid that changing the name of `dcat:catalog` has more disadvantages than advantages. In particular, It would limit back-compatibility with previous DCAT recommendations and undesirably impact the existing implementations. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-801132051 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 14:31:25 UTC