Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)

> I would then go further and propose (in the same way) for having `dcat:hasCatalogMember` and `dcat:inCatalog` for the relationships between the `dcat:Catalog` and the `dcat:DatasetSeries`.

Thanks for the comment, @riannella: 

`dcat:catalog` is already used in existing implementations,  as it was defined in DCAT 2. Moreover,  it follows the same name convention of `dcat:dataset`, `dcat:distribution`, `dcat:record` defined in DCAT 1, and `dcat:service` defined in DCAT 2.   

  I am afraid that changing the name of  `dcat:catalog` has more disadvantages than advantages. In particular, It would limit back-compatibility with previous DCAT recommendations and undesirably impact the existing implementations.

GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 14:31:25 UTC