- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:27:49 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> > In tonight's call, `dcat:catalogMember`has been proposed instead of `dcat:hasCatalogMember` to maintain the consistence with `dcat:catalog`, `dcat:dataset`, `dcat:distribution`, `dcat:record`. > > @andrea-perego, @riannella, @dr-shorthair: How `dcat:catalogMember` sounds to you? > > @riccardoAlbertoni, if I correctly recall the last meeting, the discussion was about the relationship between a series and its members, with a proposal of calling it `dcat:seriesMember`. > > To be consistent, the relationship between a `dcat:Catalog` and a `dcat:Resource` should rather be `dcat:resource`. I would also avoid relating the two semantically, as the notion of "membership" in a catalogue is not exactly the same one of dataset series. Thanks, @andrea-perego , you are right. I switched series and catalog for some mysterious reasons, but series was the one I meant. My apologies ... . -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-803953052 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 22 March 2021 10:27:50 UTC