- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:30:02 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@aisaac said: > @andrea-perego thanks for the answer. I must say I am mildly convinced by the discussion on #1225. The protocol URI seems to have appeared out of the blue there, without explanation. I think it came out after I made a reference - see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1225#issuecomment-718265384 - to the list of URIs maintained by OSGeo, where they use https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol : https://github.com/OSGeo/Cat-Interop/blob/master/LinkPropertyLookupTable.csv > I have tried to see if the European Data Portal could give us expectation of the usage of the protocol URI vs the query language URI. Firing the query > > [...] > > at https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sparql-manager/en/ > I obtained only results with `https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/`. _But_ they seem to come from one catalogue, so I'm not sure this is a strong proof. > > Maybe this is something we could ask advice from the wider group? Unless you can show me some more motivation, which I would probably accept :-) An argument could be that what distinguishes a service / API are the protocol and query parameters, whereas it is not necessarily bound to a specific query language (there are services / APIs that support different query languages). But we should indeed ask input from the group. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1211#issuecomment-808962311 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2021 21:30:04 UTC