- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:17:14 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I find _parts_ and _parent/child_ to ok for generic relationships. I think we can be more specific and use property names that are aligned to the domain of _data catalog publishing_. @dr-shorthair proposal above with `dcat:hasSeriesMember` and `dcat:inSeries` is good for the relationships between the `dcat:DatasetSeries` and the `dcat:Dataset`. I would then go further and propose (in the same way) for having `dcat:hasCatalogMember` and `dcat:inCatalog` for the relationships between the `dcat:Catalog` and the `dcat:DatasetSeries`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-800855386 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 07:17:16 UTC