Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)

@larsgsvensson ,

Trying to verify whether the remaining points you raised have been eventually addressed. 

Many thanks for your patience.

About this one - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1020#issuecomment-529351294 :

> One very minor nit on point 10.: The text for the link to https://dcat-ap.de/def/ reads "DCAT-AP.de als formaler Metadatenstandard für offene Verwaltungsdaten bestätigt". The actual title of the document is "Vokabulare und Dokumente für DCAT-AP.de".

The corresponding revision has been implemented via PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1059

See: https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#bib-dcat-ap.de

About your point (2) , following discussion in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1225 , we have updated the guidance section on conformance (see PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1310) to provide some recommendations on the URIs to be used with `dcterms:conformsTo`:

https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#quality-conformance-statement

I copy-paste here the relevant text:

> In order to ensure interoperability, it is important to consistently use the URIs identifying the reference standards / specifications. In particular, DCAT recommends the following general rules:
>
> - Use URIs from reference registries, when available. Examples include the W3C TR registry, the OGC Definitions Server, the ISO OBP.
> - Use the URI of the standard / specification, and not the namespace URI. E.g., to express conformance with DCAT, the URI to be used is https://www.w3.org.org/TR/vocab-dcat/, and not http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#.
> - Use the canonical, persistent URI. This is usually specified in the document itself. If you are in doubt, use the one included in the bibliographic citations for that standard / specification.
> - Use the non-versioned URI. If you need to express conformance with a specific version of the standard / specification, use both the un-versioned and the versioned URI. E.g., in case you need to explicitly state conformance with DCAT 2, use both https://www.w3.org.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ and https://www.w3.org.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/.

There is still some discussion ongoing on the criteria above (in particular, in issues https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1211 and https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1338), so they can be revised / extended.

Could you please confirm that with this we have addressed all your comments?

Thanks! 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1020#issuecomment-808966349 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 28 March 2021 22:02:43 UTC