Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)

I tend to agree with @agreiner . 

@riannella wants to keep track of members from the context of the series. But this is easily done with just the one predicate.. When he adds a new member `<m99>` to a series `<s88>`, he adds this triple to the graph:

```
<m99> dcat:inSeries <s88> . 
```

then he can easily find all the members of the series with a simple query of that direction, e.g. in SPARQL

```
SELECT ?s ?m 
WHERE { ?m dcat:inSeries ?s }
```

Doesn't that satisfy the requirement @riannella ?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1335#issuecomment-805229361 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2021 20:29:34 UTC