- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:18:12 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> Looking at this thread, I think there's a general agreement on `dcat:inSeries` (which is what is issue was specifically about), but still some concerns on its inverse and other design issues (including those raised by @agreiner ). > > Therefore, I propose we revise PR #1292 by provisionally removing the inverse of `dcat:inSeries`, and then merge it (it has been around for quite a while, and it is addressing also other issues). > > For the inverse of `dcat:inSeries` and other discussion topics, we will instead create separate issues, and move the discussion there. This would also help better track the decisions that will be taken on them. Yes, I agree with the direction you have suggested. I am going to update the PR and open a new issue accordingly. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-803947193 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 22 March 2021 10:18:14 UTC