Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)

Following up from my previous comment - there are two aspects, the text of the specification and the RDF representation.
@aidig perhaps you can clarify, but my reading of your issue is that you were referring to the RDF representation rather than the spec when pointing out about the labels? Or were you referring to both?

I think that for the spec, it is clear when it refers to a class or a property, e.g. see

For the RDF, I can see the value of adding an alternative label (e.g. ```skos:Label has catalog```) but I think it is useful that the main label aligns to the actual property name (```rdfs:label catalog```). 

GitHub Notification of comment by agbeltran
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Friday, 26 March 2021 17:59:37 UTC