Thursday, 30 September 2010
- RE: AHEM_* fonts not suitable for use on GNOME desktops
- Time for tests with script to settle?
- AHEM_* fonts not suitable for use on GNOME desktops
- Re: More paged media test issues
- i want help you with css
- More paged media test issues
- Re: Paged media tests
- Paged media tests
- Re: JavaScript errors in tests
- RE: JavaScript errors in tests
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
- JavaScript errors in tests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Next CSS 2.1 test suite version?
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Errors in testinfo.data
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- Re: Animated test flag
- Errors in testinfo.data
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
Monday, 27 September 2010
- RE: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- RE: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- RE: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- RE: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- RE: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
Sunday, 26 September 2010
Saturday, 25 September 2010
Sunday, 26 September 2010
Monday, 27 September 2010
- CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: organizational
- CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: general test issues
- CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: slicing and dicing
- RC1 : Microsoft's absolute-non-replaced-width-008
Sunday, 26 September 2010
- background-attachment-applies-to-*
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
Saturday, 25 September 2010
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: table-anonymous-objects-0xx
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: table-anonymous-objects-0xx
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
- Re: Animated test flag
- Animated test flag
- Metadata changes in approved tests
- Re: HTML tests? (html-attribute-*/html-precedence-*)
- HTML tests? (html-attribute-*/html-precedence-*)
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: table-anonymous-objects-0xx
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1 : flag for javascript support in tests
- Re: Code adjustments to add for font-size-123 testcase
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1 : flag for javascript support in tests
- Re: Implementation Report Template for CSS2.1 Test Suite
- Re: uri-012.xht invalid
- Re: case-insensitivity-001 invalid in XHTML format
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
Friday, 24 September 2010
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
- Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
- RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases
- RC1: absolute-replaced-width-007 , absolute-replaced-width-014 and absolute-replaced-width-021
Thursday, 23 September 2010
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
- Test Harness for CSS 2.1 test suite: it's up and working
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of CSS 2.1 RC1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Fractional pixel problem in width-091 ; background-root-0xx to avoid HTML, BODY, canvas words
- Re: Fractional pixel problem in width-091 : 1% of distance in Microsoft's testcases
- Fractional pixel problem in width-091 ; background-root-0xx to avoid HTML, BODY, canvas words
- Incorrect assert in clear-applies-to-013
- Re: Proposed code modifications to html-attribute-019 (.xht and .htm)
Monday, 20 September 2010
- Proposed code modifications to html-attribute-019 (.xht and .htm)
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Code adjustments to add for font-size-123 testcase
- RE: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1 : flag for javascript support in tests
- numbers-units-012 , numbers-units-013 , numbers-units-014 require adjustments
- RE: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1 : flag for javascript support in tests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1 : flag for javascript support in tests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- RE: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- Re: clear-float-001 , floats-006: questionable testcases
- clear-float-001 , floats-006: questionable testcases
Sunday, 19 September 2010
- Implementation Report Template for CSS2.1 Test Suite
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- at-charset-013 invalid in XHTML
- at-charset-012 invalid in XHTML
- uri-012.xht invalid
Saturday, 18 September 2010
- sgml-comments-001 invalid in XHTML format
- comments-006 invalid
- case-insensitivity-001 invalid in XHTML format
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
Friday, 17 September 2010
- Review Report on section 9.3.2 (top box offset) ~= 26 testcases
- CSS2.1 Test Suite Build RC 1
- 5 testcases still afflicted by Fractional pixel problem and 1 display inline test
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.1.x to 9.2.3 ~= 78 testcases
- Re: Microsoft's cascade-006.htm
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.1.x to 9.2.3 ~= 78 testcases
- Re: 'top: auto' or 'left: auto' on abs. pos. or fixed pos. testcases: abspos-020 with a "may" flag
Thursday, 16 September 2010
- 4 padding-[top|right]-applies-to-013 and 014 requiring corrections
- 4 margin and 1 padding Microsoft testcases needing corrections
- Re: Review Report on section 8.5.x (Border property) ~= 260 testcases
- Re: Review Report on section 8.5.x (Border property) ~= 260 testcases
- Re: Review Report on section 8.5.x (Border property) ~= 260 testcases
- Re: Proposed replacements for background-root-020.htm and tables-001.htm
- Re: Proposed replacements for background-root-020.htm and tables-001.htm
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
- Width and height set on 'display: inline' elements in a few testcases
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases: root-box-002.xht
- Re: 8 questionable border-style conflict resolution testcases in collapsing border model (Section 17.6.2.1)
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Proposed replacements for left-113.htm and right-113.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
- Re: c525-font-wt-000.htm and extensive, thorough font-weight testing
- Re: Armenian tests for CSS 2.1
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Review Report on section 9.3.2 (right box offset) ~= 22 testcases
- Many problems with right-offset-002.htm testcase
Monday, 13 September 2010
- 8 questionable border-style conflict resolution testcases in collapsing border model (Section 17.6.2.1)
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Review Report on section 9.3.2 (left box offset) ~= 42 testcases
Sunday, 12 September 2010
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Re: Armenian tests for CSS 2.1
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Fractional pixel problem with height-083 , height-084 , width-083 , width-084 (and in min- and max- as well)
Saturday, 11 September 2010
- Proposed replacements for background-root-020.htm and tables-001.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: background-root-020.htm and tables-001.htm
- c525-font-wt-000.htm and extensive, thorough font-weight testing
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
Friday, 10 September 2010
- RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Armenian tests for CSS 2.1
- RE: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- RE: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Parsing Invalid Declarations with Character Escapes
- Re: Parsing Invalid Declarations with Character Escapes
- RE: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Parsing Invalid Declarations with Character Escapes
- Re: Parsing Invalid Declarations with Character Escapes
- RE: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- RE: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Parsing Invalid Declarations with Character Escapes
- Parsing Invalid Declarations with Character Escapes
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property): c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property) ~= 125 testcases
- Re: [CSS21] Backing up in tokenizer (issue 129)
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property): c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property) ~= 125 testcases
Thursday, 9 September 2010
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property): c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property): c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property): c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002 , table-visual-layout-024
- Re: Review Report on section 8.4 (Padding property) ~= 125 testcases
- Better shape description for height-025 , height-069 , height-080 and their min-, max- and width correspondent
- Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass: separated-borders-model-007 and min-height-106
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: separated-borders-model-007
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording: c414-flt-ln-002.htm
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- Re: Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Tests with difficult/confusing pass condition/wording
- Some obscure details of CSS
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
- Re: Automating testcases
- Re: Automating testcases
- position-applies-to-001 .. position-applies-to-007 .. position-applies-to-015
Monday, 6 September 2010
Sunday, 5 September 2010
- Review Report on sections 9.2.4 to 9.3.2 ~= 169 testcases
- Re: Automating testcases
- Re: Automating testcases
- Re: Automating testcases
- Re: Automating testcases
- Automating testcases
Saturday, 4 September 2010
Wednesday, 1 September 2010
- Microsoft's outline-style-hidden-001 testcase
- Re: Issue 144 resolved as undefined
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.1.x to 9.2.3 ~= 78 testcases
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.1.x to 9.2.3 ~= 78 testcases
- Re: Review Report on sections 9.1.x to 9.2.3 ~= 78 testcases
- Review Report on sections 9.1.x to 9.2.3 ~= 78 testcases