- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:04:32 +0000
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 4:45 PM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: Geoffrey Sneddon; Anne van Kesteren; L. David Baron; John Jansen; > fantasai; Arron Eicholz; public-css-testsuite@w3.org > Subject: Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests > > On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > >> From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com] > >> > >> Apple has not run the test suite in full. I've done about 25% of the > >> tests so far. > > > > You said on Sunday that "I've been through about 60% of the HTML4 > tests > > in the 20100917 suite, and have some feedback". I guess I was over- > optimistic > > about what 'going through' meant :) > > Half of the HTML4 tests is 25% of the entire suite. The half vs. 60% > number is because > I need to go back to look at skipped tests. > > Is this a good time to question the need to run every single test in > both HTML4 and XHTML1 formats? I was just going to ask.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 00:06:41 UTC