- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:14:12 +0100
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
On 28/09/10 04:31, Simon Fraser wrote: > The following tests have bogus data in the 'flags' column in testinfo.data, in suite 20100917: > block-in-inline-007 Heh, just got assert/flags mixed up. Fixed. > outline-width-096 Already fixed by gtalbot. > The following tests have "DOM", rather than "dom" as a flag: > content-computed-value-003 > content-computed-value-001 > content-computed-value-002 Fixed. (Arron: those are all MS tests, FWIW.) > The following test has a flag, 'evil', that is not documented onhttp://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/format#requirement-flags > bidi-alt-001 That's been there (and only in that test) since it was added… I've removed it, as as far as I can tell it should have never been there. > Am I correct in thinking that all refs are assumed to be "=" refs? Yeah. -- Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software <http://gsnedders.com> <http://opera.com>
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 17:14:50 UTC