W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Errors in testinfo.data

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:14:12 +0100
Message-ID: <4CA22264.4080407@opera.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
On 28/09/10 04:31, Simon Fraser wrote:
> The following tests have bogus data in the 'flags' column in testinfo.data, in suite 20100917:
> block-in-inline-007

Heh, just got assert/flags mixed up. Fixed.

> outline-width-096

Already fixed by gtalbot.

> The following tests have "DOM", rather than "dom" as a flag:
> content-computed-value-003
> content-computed-value-001
> content-computed-value-002

Fixed. (Arron: those are all MS tests, FWIW.)

> The following test has a flag, 'evil', that is not documented onhttp://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/format#requirement-flags
> bidi-alt-001

That's been there (and only in that test) since it was added… I've 
removed it, as as far as I can tell it should have never been there.

> Am I correct in thinking that all refs are assumed to be "=" refs?


Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 17:14:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC