>>>>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm >> <meta name="flags" content="ahem"> >>>>>> should be replaced with >>>>>> <meta name="flags" content="ahem invalid"> >>>>> Fixed. >>>>> http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm >>>>>> A font-size 16px version of this test is available. >>>>> ? >>>> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm >>> I think the 12px version is better, because it doesn't require >>> use of a repeating decimal for the inches. :) >> http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm >> I don't like fractions like 0.16667 in any testcase either ... or >> odd-looking fractions like 1.00542cm . > > 1.6667 is worse because it's supposed to be 1.66666666... [on until > infinity] > You can't ever actually represent it in CSS. > >>> Was there a reason you wanted to create a 16px version? >>> ~fantasai >> >> Well, yes. In order to meet my very own recommendations which I >> emailed >> on september 25th 2007 with subject line: >> "CSS 2.1 Test suite: minimal font size problem and issue" >> I sent it to Ian Hickson but also to you. That email had IMO a few >> good >> reasons to create 16px version. > > If that's the reason, then you should use not 16px for the font, > but some other number (greater than 16px) that doesn't result in > the need for a repeating decimal. Do that, and I would be happy > to replace the testcase with yours. I'll keep that in mind! I have in the past converted some Ian Hickson testcases into font-size: 16px Done this time with 24px ( == .25in): http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm I've added an empty <meta>-assert. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 3; August 15th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 02:09:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC