> On 08/08/2010 07:09 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Testcases involving 'top: auto' or 'left: auto' on abs. pos. or fixed >> pos. elements should be adjusted so that section 10.3.7[1] and >> 10.6.4[2] >> can apply. In other words, the predicted rendered layout by the >> testcases is optional, unreliable/uncertain, should be marked as not >> necessary for conformance or should be labelled/marked with a "may" >> flag.. whatever. (...) >> >> CSS Test: position: fixed; top: auto; test - html margin >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/abspos-020.htm >> >> CSS Test: position: fixed; top: auto; test - margin collapsing >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/abspos-021.htm >> > > Fixed, aside from abspos-020, which seems to have been removed > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/hixie/submitted/css2.1/visuren/abspos-020.htm has not been removed and it should get the "may" flag. You probably meant to say abspos-21 which seems to have been removed. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 3; August 15th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 00:22:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC