W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2010

Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: list of 69 incorrect testcases

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:32:21 +0200
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vjkxz7r164w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:03:16 +0200, Gérard Talbot  
<css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote:
> "
> (...) Documents that do not specify default scripting language
> information and that contain elements that specify an intrinsic event
> script are incorrect. (...)
> "
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#h-
> If default script language is not provided, then how is an user agent
> going to be sure/to know in advance that this inline script is
> "text/javascript" media type and that other one over somewhere else is
> "text/vbscript" media type? That is why, I believe, default scripting
> language should be specified in case of inline script.

I do not think that holding up the CSS 2.1 test suite against HTML4 for  
scrutiny is a good use of our time. HTML4 is not what is being implemented  
by the implementors we want to pass the CSS 2.1 test suite.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 08:33:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC