- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:32:21 +0200
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:03:16 +0200, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote: > " > (...) Documents that do not specify default scripting language > information and that contain elements that specify an intrinsic event > script are incorrect. (...) > " > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.2.1 > > If default script language is not provided, then how is an user agent > going to be sure/to know in advance that this inline script is > "text/javascript" media type and that other one over somewhere else is > "text/vbscript" media type? That is why, I believe, default scripting > language should be specified in case of inline script. I do not think that holding up the CSS 2.1 test suite against HTML4 for scrutiny is a good use of our time. HTML4 is not what is being implemented by the implementors we want to pass the CSS 2.1 test suite. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 08:33:03 UTC