- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:50:16 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
> On 09/09/2010 02:13 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: >>>> Author: Ian Hickson >>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm <meta name="flags" content="ahem"> >>>> should be replaced with >>>> <meta name="flags" content="ahem invalid"> >>> Fixed. >>> http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm >>>> A font-size 16px version of this test is available. >>> ? >> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/c5508-ipadn-b-003.htm > I think the 12px version is better, because it doesn't require > use of a repeating decimal for the inches. :) I don't like fractions like 0.16667 in any testcase either ... or odd-looking fractions like 1.00542cm . > Was there a reason you wanted to create a 16px version? > ~fantasai Well, yes. In order to meet my very own recommendations which I emailed on september 25th 2007 with subject line: "CSS 2.1 Test suite: minimal font size problem and issue" I sent it to Ian Hickson but also to you. That email had IMO a few good reasons to create 16px version. What appears in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2007Sep/0011.html is not the email I sent but only Ian Hickson's reply to it. Also: Re: Added line breaking, page breaking, and minimum font size assumptions http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2007Sep/0014.html regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 3; August 15th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 23:50:51 UTC