- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:34:57 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Saturday 2010-09-18 23:08 -0700, fantasai wrote: > On 09/18/2010 04:30 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >On Friday 2010-09-17 16:35 -0700, fantasai wrote: > >>Sorry for the delay; it took me longer than I expected to address all > >>of GĂ©rard's comments on hixie and bzbarsky's tests. > >> > >>I've just posted a build of the test suite: > >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/ > >>And there's a zip available as well: > >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/ > >> > >>This is built off SVN revision 1465. Let me know if there's anything > >>obviously broken and I'll respin. I'll put together release notes > >>later today. > > > >Should there be an implementation report template linked from one of > >the above pages? > > Yes. Link added, sorry. > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/ Does there happen to be an existing list of all the tests with some additional metadata (in particular, reference and whether the test is marked as interactive) that I could use to divide the tests into the following three categories: (1) tests with references (2) non-interactive tests without references (3) interactive tests I realized that I could actually use our reftest framework for both (1) and (2), since in (2), there are large numbers of tests that look exactly the same, so I only need to look at each unique image once. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 01:35:31 UTC