- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:25:01 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
> On Tuesday 2010-08-31 19:21 -0700, "GĂ©rard Talbot" wrote: >> Author: Ian Hickson >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/inlines-013.htm >> >> <img src="support/1x1-white.png"> is missing the alt. >> >> <link rel="help" title="9.5.1 Positioning the float: the 'float' >> property" >> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#float-position"> >> should be added >> >> Rejected because of that >> >> ---------------------- >> >> Author: Ian Hickson >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/inlines-014.htm >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/inlines-015.htm >> >> alt attribute missing >> >> Both rejected > > Does this mean the tests won't be in the test suite as a result of > missing an alt attribute? Or will the tests be corrected and still > be in the test suite? > > -David Hello David, No, they should not be rejected as a result of missing an alt attribute. These 3 testcases should be corrected more than they should be excluded, rejected. I don't remember why I wrote this. Sorry about that. At one point, I just wanted to say that these testcases required adjustements, corrections. I mentioned that several of these tests lack a proper more correct <link rel="help" href="...">, <meta name="flags" content="...">, <meta name="assert" content="..."> too. This is the case here. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 3; August 15th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:25:38 UTC