- From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:54:57 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-css-testsuite- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:19 AM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org > Subject: Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests > > On 9/21/10 1:34 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > So let's be very > > conservative and call it 5 days. That is still substantially less, > > imo, than building an automation system, testing it, converting part - or all ? > - of the testcases to reftests (or whatever input format the automation > expects), finding any mistakes from that process etc. > > That last part, I agree with. I just disagree with the blanket assertion that it's > possible to run the test suite and analyze the failures in 3 days for one person > in its current state. Again, though, I wouldn't expect you to analyze the failures. I would expect that you run the suite, pass/fail every test, submit the IR, then farm out the analysis and follow up with the WG if necessary or log bugs against the browser - whatever is appropriate. -John > > Also, note that my comments here are my personal comments, NOT > representing Mozilla in any way. If there is an official Mozilla statement here, > it'll be clearly labeled as such, I assure you.... > > -Boris >
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 18:55:33 UTC