W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2010

Re: RC1 : 1st preliminary review report: table-anonymous-objects-0xx

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:57:51 -0700
Message-ID: <7d34f2d8157bb89167347076195df514.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

> On 9/25/10 4:41 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>> It's helpful to people trying to understand the test if you use
>> meaningful class and ID names
> I don't see how style="display: table-row" is less meaningful than
> class="table-row"....  That's the most common use of inline styles in
> those tests, iirc.
> -Boris


In this precise case above, it is not less meaningful, it is not less
self-explanatory, it is not less understandable.

It seems to me that you use, for instance,

<div style="position: relative; font-size: 2em;">
<div style="position: relative; z-index: 1; color: red; padding: 1px;">

in several dozens of table-anonymous-objects-xxx.htm testcases. I have

  <div id="rel-pos-wrapper">
    <div id="rel-pos-red-overlapped">

as a replacement for such inline styles.

Now, it is all up to you, Boris, to adopt such suggestion, to ignore
such suggestion altogether or to come up with better id semantics.

regards, Gérard
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC1; September 17th 2010):

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 22:58:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC