public-audio@w3.org from January to March 2013 by date

Saturday, 30 March 2013

• [Bug 21446] New: Specify what AnalyserNode should do bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• OfflineAudioContext specification gaps Joseph Berkovitz
• [Bug 21445] New: Specify what DynamicsProcessorNode should do bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 29 March 2013

• [Bug 17415] (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17415] (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 28 March 2013

• [Bug 21426] New: Specify what should happen when the input channel count changes for delay nodes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

• [Bug 21417] New: Allow the UA to control the buffer size used to call back the AudioProcessingEvent handler bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17415] (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• ISSUE-108: Change the deprecation text to remove the recommendation to implement the deprecated methods Audio Working Group Issue Tracker
• Audio EQ Cookbook in the W3C Web Audio API Spec Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

• [Bug 20698] Need way to determine "performance.now()" time of current audio output bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• FTF - reception is on fourth floor<eom> Chris Wilson

Saturday, 23 March 2013

• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Chris Rogers
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari

Friday, 22 March 2013

• Re: FW: Yamaha at WG F2F meeting. Ryoya KAWAI
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Jer Noble
• FW: Yamaha at WG F2F meeting. Olivier Thereaux
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Joe Berkovitz

Thursday, 21 March 2013

• Re: Looping a specific number of times Robert O'Callahan
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Robert O'Callahan
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Kumar
• [Bug 17351] (addEventListener): AudioNode.addEventListener not defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Chris Wilson
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Robert O'Callahan
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Ehsan Akhgari
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Srikumar Subramanian

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Robert O'Callahan
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Joe Berkovitz
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Chris Rogers
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Chris Wilson
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: Looping a specific number of times Chris Wilson
• Looping a specific number of times Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Chris Rogers
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Bug 21345] New: There should be notification when the destination output changed bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21344] behavior not defined when AudioParam setting invalid value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21344] New: behavior not defined when AudioParam setting invalid value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Robert O'Callahan
• Re: AudioNode GC rules Jussi Kalliokoski
• AudioNode GC rules Robert O'Callahan
• Re: ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Russell McClellan
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Chris Rogers
• Re: ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Chris Rogers
• Re: Audio f2f agenda Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: createScriptProcessor crashing chrome canary? Olli Pettay
• Re: ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Srikumar Subramanian
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Joe Berkovitz
• ScriptProccessor events are stopping atfer a short while Peter van der Noord
• createScriptProcessor crashing chrome canary? Peter van der Noord
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: stability of AudioBufferSourceNode.playbackState, and activeSourceCount Ehsan Akhgari

Monday, 18 March 2013

• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 17 March 2013

• [Bug 21311] OfflineAudioContext needs a way to handle audio of arbitrary duration bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 16 March 2013

• [Bug 21311] OfflineAudioContext needs a way to handle audio of arbitrary duration bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21311] New: OfflineAudioContext needs a way to handle audio of arbitrary duration bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 15 March 2013

• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Thierry MICHEL
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 14 March 2013

• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Doug Schepers
• Re: Audio f2f agenda Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Audio f2f agenda Chris Rogers
• [Minutes] Audio WG teleconference, 14th March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Audio f2f agenda Olivier Thereaux
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Doug Schepers
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: OfflineAudioContext Concerns Robert O'Callahan

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

• Re: OfflineAudioContext Concerns Russell McClellan
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Jan Deinhard
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Pierre-Louis Bossart
• [Bug 17410] (AudioPannerNodeModels): AudioPannerNode models underdefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20840] Use Web IDL to define OfflineAudioContext's contructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17493] JSAudioNode should be an EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Jan Deinhard
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Robert O'Callahan
• Re: OfflineAudioContext Concerns Chris Rogers

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

• OfflineAudioContext Concerns Russell McClellan
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Chris Rogers
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Pierre-Louis Bossart
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 14 March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Dominic Cooney
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Jean-Charles JC Verdié

Monday, 11 March 2013

• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Pierre-Louis Bossart
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Chris Rogers
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Chris Rogers
• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Chris Rogers
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Ehsan Akhgari
• [Bug 21248] New: AudioProcessingEvent.node must be readonly bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 10 March 2013

• [Bug 21240] Specify what should happen when passing invalid offset/duration values to AudioBufferSourceNode.start bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21240] Specify what should happen when passing invalid offset/duration values to AudioBufferSourceNode.start bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21240] New: Specify what should happen when passing invalid offset/duration values to AudioBufferSourceNode.start bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 8 March 2013

• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] Mandate a useful accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21223] New: Mandate the accepted sampling rate ranges for buffers created through AudioContext.createBuffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

• Re: Changing the sample rate of the audio device Chris Rogers
• Changing the sample rate of the audio device Jan Deinhard
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Robert O'Callahan

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Joseph Berkovitz
• Action Items housekeepping Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Daylight Saving Time change –first half of 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time change –first half of 2013 Thierry MICHEL
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Dominic Cooney
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Chris Rogers
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Chris Rogers
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Joe Berkovitz

Monday, 4 March 2013

• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Chris Rogers
• Re: Implementation news - Mozilla Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Ehsan Akhgari
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20840] Use Web IDL to define OfflineAudioContext's contructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20840] Use Web IDL to define OfflineAudioContext's contructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: web audio conformance test framework Chris Lowis
• Re: web audio conformance test framework Chris Lowis

Friday, 1 March 2013

• Re: [Minutes] Audio Wg teleconference, 2013-02-28 Chris Rogers
• On the Wiki: activity stream updated, f2f page Olivier Thereaux
• RE: [Minutes] Audio Wg teleconference, 2013-02-28 Wei, James

Thursday, 28 February 2013

• Re: Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Chris Wilson
• Re: Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Ashley Gullen
• Re: Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Chris Wilson
• Re: Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Chris Wilson
• Re: Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Ashley Gullen
• [Minutes] Audio Wg teleconference, 2013-02-28 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Matt Diamond
• Re: Teleconference Thursday 28th February Chris Wilson
• Web Audio API spec: readonly & LFO Ashley Gullen
• Re: Teleconference Thursday 28th February Chris Lowis
• Re: Teleconference Thursday 28th February Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: Teleconference Thursday 28th February Chris Wilson

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

• Re: Teleconference Thursday 28th February Chris Wilson
• Re: Teleconference Thursday 28th February Thierry MICHEL
• Teleconference Thursday 28th February Christopher Lowis
• Re: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Thierry MICHEL
• Dynamic change of Audio Destination Wei, James
• RE: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Wei, James

Monday, 25 February 2013

• Re: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Thierry MICHEL
• Re: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Chris Rogers
• Re: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Joseph Berkovitz
• Implementation news - Mozilla Olivier Thereaux

Friday, 22 February 2013

• logistics info for the next F2F meeting at Google San Francisco March 26/27 Thierry MICHEL
• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Robert O'Callahan

Thursday, 21 February 2013

• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Olivier Thereaux
• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Marcos Caceres
• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Thierry MICHEL
• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Chris Wilson
• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Chris Rogers
• Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Script Processor onaudioprocess() gives up the ghost? Dominic Cooney
• Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Dominic Cooney
• Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Dominic Cooney

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

• better information on iOS unmute conditions? Grant Galitz
• Re: ondisconnect, was Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Marcos Caceres
• Re: ondisconnect, was Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Chris Wilson
• ondisconnect, was Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Marcos Caceres
• Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Chris Wilson
• Re: Script Processor onaudioprocess() gives up the ghost? Lonce Wyse
• Re: Script Processor onaudioprocess() gives up the ghost? Nick Thompson
• Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Marcos Caceres
• Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Dominic Cooney
• Script Processor onaudioprocess() gives up the ghost? lonce
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Marcos Caceres
• Should MIDIInput use a callback instead of events? Dominic Cooney
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17351] (addEventListener): AudioNode.addEventListener not defined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17493] JSAudioNode should be an EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 18 February 2013

• [Bug 17325] (ExceptionType): Undefined exception type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 17 February 2013

• [Bug 17325] (ExceptionType): Undefined exception type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: iOS 6.1 regression? Joe Berkovitz
• iOS 6.1 regression? Grant Galitz

Friday, 15 February 2013

• [Minutes] Audio WG teleconference 2013-02-14 Chris Lowis

Thursday, 14 February 2013

• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing Robert O'Callahan
• More details about channel up and down-mixing Chris Rogers

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

• Re: Next Teleconference Thursday 14th February Joe Berkovitz
• Re: Next Teleconference Thursday 14th February Thierry MICHEL
• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Peter van der Noord
• Re: Next Teleconference Thursday 14th February Chris Wilson
• Next Teleconference Thursday 14th February Chris Lowis

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Peter van der Noord
• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Raymond Toy
• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Peter van der Noord
• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Peter van der Noord
• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Raymond Toy
• Re: Different results in decodeAudioData? Joseph Berkovitz
• Different results in decodeAudioData? Peter van der Noord
• Re: Problems with multiple functioncalls on the outputbuffer in a ScriptProcessorNode Peter van der Noord

Monday, 11 February 2013

• Re: Problems with multiple functioncalls on the outputbuffer in a ScriptProcessorNode Joe Berkovitz
• Problems with multiple functioncalls on the outputbuffer in a ScriptProcessorNode Peter van der Noord
• New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created Olivier Thereaux

Sunday, 10 February 2013

• Web Audio declarations file for typescript Peter van der Noord

Saturday, 9 February 2013

• Re: webaudio developers list/forum Olivier Thereaux
• webaudio developers list/forum lonce

Friday, 8 February 2013

• [Bug 17325] (ExceptionType): Undefined exception type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Call for Agenda Items Chris Wilson
• Call for Agenda Items Christopher Lowis

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

• Re: ChannelMergerNode mixing semantics seem weird in dynamic situations Chris Rogers
• Re: Clarification of the AudioParam time/values in the spec Chris Rogers
• Proposal re: MediaStream Processing API Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Next Teleconferences: 14th Feb, 28th Feb, 14th Mar, f2f 26-27 Mar 2013 Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: Clarification of the AudioParam time/values in the spec Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: Clarification of the AudioParam time/values in the spec Chris Rogers

Monday, 4 February 2013

• Clarification of the AudioParam time/values in the spec Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: MIDI issues Chris Lowis

Thursday, 31 January 2013

• [Bug 20842] New: The spec is very vague on the details of OfflineAudioContext creation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Some additional requirements for the ScriptProcessorNode .. Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Next Teleconferences: 14th Feb, 28th Feb, 14th Mar, f2f 26-27 Mar 2013 Thierry MICHEL
• [Bug 20841] New: Fix the wording in the AudioDestinationNode spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20840] New: Use Web IDL to define OfflineAudioContext's contructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Next Teleconferences: 14th Feb, 28th Feb, 14th Mar, f2f 26-27 Mar 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• Some additional requirements for the ScriptProcessorNode .. Kumar

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

• Re: Some additional requirements for the ScriptProcessorNode .. Robert O'Callahan
• Re: MIDI issues Olivier Thereaux
• [WebAudio/web-midi-api] 638d5f: Added reference to "octet". Jussi Kalliokoski
• [WebAudio/web-midi-api] 638d5f: Added reference to "octet". Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: MIDI issues Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Some additional requirements for the ScriptProcessorNode .. Lonce Wyse
• Some additional requirements for the ScriptProcessorNode .. Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

• [Bug 20822] New: Clarify the exception codes thrown by AudioParam.exponentialRampToValueAtTime bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• MIDI issues Chris Wilson
• Web Audio Processing: Use Cases and Requirements is a W3C WG NOTE Thierry MICHEL

Monday, 28 January 2013

• Re: idea for audio and video tags in html5 Robert O'Callahan

Sunday, 27 January 2013

• idea for audio and video tags in html5 GIDEON ISAAC

Friday, 25 January 2013

• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Teleconference on Thursday 24th - cancelled. Chris Lowis
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Frederick Umminger
• Re: Teleconference on Thursday 24th - cancelled. Chris Wilson
• Re: The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Chris Wilson

Thursday, 24 January 2013

• The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget Ehsan Akhgari
• [Bug 20764] It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20764] New: It makes no sense to use EventListener for onaudioprocess if ScriptProcessorNode isn't EventTarget bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Soares Chen

Thursday, 24 January 2013

• Re: About AudioPannerNode Chris Pike
• Re: About AudioPannerNode Chris Pike
• Re: About AudioPannerNode Chris Pike
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Pike
• [Bug 17424] Setting sample rates for individual JavaScriptProcessingNodes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: about deciding the sample rate when AudioContext is created Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Bug 20750] New: Specify exactly what should happen when createScriptProcessor is passed invalid arguments bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: about deciding the sample rate when AudioContext is created Robert O'Callahan
• about deciding the sample rate when AudioContext is created Wei, James

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

• Re: Teleconference on Thursday 24th - cancelled. Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Chris Wilson
• Teleconference on Thursday 24th - cancelled. Chris Lowis
• Re: Query: Audio Recording(Accessing microphone) Robert O'Callahan
• Re: About AudioPannerNode Robert O'Callahan
• Re: About AudioPannerNode Frederick Umminger
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Frederick Umminger
• Re: About AudioPannerNode Frederick Umminger
• Query: Audio Recording(Accessing microphone) Chhabi Gupta
• Relative pace of our specs (Was: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API) Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Chris Wilson
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Determining Output Latency Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian
• Re: Determining Output Latency Chris Wilson
• Re: Determining Output Latency Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

• RE: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Tom White \(MMA\)
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Chris Wilson
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Chris Wilson
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API olivier Thereaux
• Re: CfC: Republish Audio Processing Use Cases document as WG Note Thierry MICHEL
• Re: CfC: Republish Audio Processing Use Cases document as WG Note Olivier Thereaux
• [Bug 20728] New: make 'when' parameter of start() and stop() optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 21 January 2013

• Re: Audio tuning with WebRTC Robert O'Callahan
• Audio tuning with WebRTC Giguet, DavidX

Sunday, 20 January 2013

• RE: Web Audio at NAMM Tom White \(MMA\)

Friday, 18 January 2013

• Re: make 'when' parameter of start() and stop() optional? Chris Rogers
• make 'when' parameter of start() and stop() optional? Robert O'Callahan
• Please Register: Audio WG f2f in San Francisco, 26-27 March 2013 Olivier Thereaux
• [Bug 19910] Disallow AudioContext.createDelay(max) where max <= 0 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20241] Make it clear that decodeAudioData needs to resample the buffer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20161] Make decodeAudioData neuter its array buffer argument when it begins decoding a buffer, and bring it back to normal when the decoding is finished bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20039] The callbacks of the decodeAudioData API are underspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20504] Typo: securityError bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20381] MIDIInput and MIDIOutput should inherit from MIDIPort, which should not be an interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20506] Do we need MIDIOutput and MIDIInput? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20411] timestamp in MIDIEvent in odds with DOM4 Event timeStamp? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20515] is the MIDIAccess object a singleton? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20509] SHOULD/MUST user permissioning mismatch bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20508] "If successCallback is not callable, abort these steps." bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20502] MIDIEvent should have a port attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20415] Add a serializer to MIDIPort bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20511] send(…, DOMHighResTimeStamp? timestamp) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20412] short is the wrong type for data parts, should be octet bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20435] Don't inline arrays in send() calls in examples bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20501] some MIDIPort attributes should be nullable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20503] requestMidiAccess() permission request bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20510] send(sequence<short> data) should just be send(any data) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20500] enumerate is misnomer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20507] Redundant assertion in requestMIDIAccess() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20523] Need alternative to REFERENCE_ERROR bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20525] MIDIAccess methods aren't restricted to instances created by requestMIDIAccess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Noteflight on Web Audio at NAMM Joseph Berkovitz
• RE: AudioBufferSourceNode issues Wei, James
• AudioBufferSourceNode issues Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Web Audio at NAMM James Ingram
• Re: ChannelMergerNode mixing semantics seem weird in dynamic situations Robert O'Callahan

Thursday, 17 January 2013

• Re: MSE and webaudio (Was: Progressive audio data decoding) Robert O'Callahan
• Re: ChannelMergerNode mixing semantics seem weird in dynamic situations Chris Rogers
• MSE and webaudio (Was: Progressive audio data decoding) Olivier Thereaux
• [Bug 20698] New: Need way to determine "performance.now()" time of current audio output bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• ChannelMergerNode mixing semantics seem weird in dynamic situations Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Clarifying the terms "inputs" and "outputs" Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Clarifying the terms "inputs" and "outputs" Chris Rogers

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

• Clarifying the terms "inputs" and "outputs" Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Peter Nyboer
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Rogers
• RE: Web Audio at NAMM Tom White \(MMA\)
• Re: Determining Output Latency Chris Rogers
• Re: Determining Output Latency Chris Rogers
• Re: Determining Output Latency Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Determining Output Latency Chris Wilson
• RE: Web Audio at NAMM Tom White \(MMA\)
• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Chris Wilson
• Re: Web Audio Api help Chris Rogers
• Determining Output Latency Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Joseph Berkovitz
• Re: Web Audio Api help My Cloud Player
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Ralph Giles
• [Bug 20681] New: spatial coords should just be in metres bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Ralph Giles
• [Bug 17396] (numberOfChannels): AudioDestinationNode.numberOfChannels bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17396] (numberOfChannels): AudioDestinationNode.numberOfChannels bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

• Re: Progressive audio data decoding Chris Wilson
• Re: Progressive audio data decoding Chris Rogers
• Re: Progressive audio data decoding Yury Delendik
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Ralph Giles
• Re: Progressive audio data decoding Chris Rogers
• Re: Progressive audio data decoding Yury Delendik
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: Progressive audio data decoding Ralph Giles
• Progressive audio data decoding Yury Delendik
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Robert O'Callahan
• RE: Web Audio at NAMM Tom White \(MMA\)

Monday, 14 January 2013

• Re: downmixing rules are path-dependent Chris Rogers
• Re: Web Audio Api help Raymond Toy

Sunday, 13 January 2013

• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Michael Good

Monday, 14 January 2013

• Re: Web Audio Api help Nick Thompson
• Re: Web Audio Api help Ray Bellis
• Re: CfC: Republish Audio Processing Use Cases document as WG Note Thierry MICHEL
• Web Audio Api help My Cloud Player
• Re: Web Audio Api help My Cloud Player
• CfC: Republish Audio Processing Use Cases document as WG Note Olivier Thereaux
• downmixing rules are path-dependent Robert O'Callahan

Saturday, 12 January 2013

• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Robert O'Callahan
• Re: constraining sample values to [-1,1] during downmixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] He Shiming
• Re: constraining sample values to [-1,1] during downmixing Chris Rogers
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Rogers

Friday, 11 January 2013

• constraining sample values to [-1,1] during downmixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Ray Bellis
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Wilson
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Wilson
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Ray Bellis
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Ray Bellis
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Wilson
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Ray Bellis
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Wilson
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Ray Bellis
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Rogers
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Ray Bellis
• Re: channel layouts and up/down mixing Chris Rogers
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Wilson
• channel layouts and up/down mixing Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] He Shiming
• Re: Bugzilla export Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Minutes] Audio WG teleconference 2013-01-10 Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Bugzilla export Olivier Thereaux
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20512] MIDIEvent lacking constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20512] MIDIEvent lacking constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20505] merge getInput, getOutput -> getPort() or getPortById() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20505] merge getInput, getOutput -> getPort() or getPortById() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] He Shiming
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Chris Wilson
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] He Shiming

Thursday, 10 January 2013

• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Wilson
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Yotam Mann
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Rogers
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Yotam Mann
• Re: Creating ADSR Envelopes Chris Wilson
• Creating ADSR Envelopes Yotam Mann
• Re: Bugzilla export Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Chris Wilson
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] He Shiming
• Re: "Version 1" of the Web Audio spec Ehsan Akhgari
• Re: Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Robert O'Callahan
• Changing sample rate, Web Audio API, getUserMedia -- forward from [chromium-discuss] Wei, James
• Re: Can the number of channels produced by an AudioNode change over time? Robert O'Callahan

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

• Re: Can the number of channels produced by an AudioNode change over time? Chris Rogers
• Can the number of channels produced by an AudioNode change over time? Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 10 Jan 2013 (Note: Thursday!) Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Web Audio at NAMM Chris Wilson

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 10 Jan 2013 (Note: Thursday!) Thierry MICHEL
• [Bug 20512] MIDIEvent lacking constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20512] MIDIEvent lacking constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20512] MIDIEvent lacking constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 17417] Define a security model for requesting access to the MIDIAccess interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20512] MIDIEvent lacking constructor bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 10 Jan 2013 (Note: Thursday!) Olivier Thereaux
• [Agenda] Audio WG Teleconference, 10 Jan 2013 (Note: Thursday!) Olivier Thereaux
• Re: [Web MIDI API] send() method should also allow 3 shorts + timestamp Chris Lilley
• RE: FYI - GDConf audio track - around the same time as our f2f meeting Olivier Thereaux
• Re: "Version 1" of the Web Audio spec Joseph Berkovitz
• Web Audio at NAMM Joseph Berkovitz

Monday, 7 January 2013

• Re: FYI - GDConf audio track - around the same time as our f2f meeting Jory
• Re: FYI - GDConf audio track - around the same time as our f2f meeting Chris Wilson
• "Version 1" of the Web Audio spec Chris Lowis
• FYI - GDConf audio track - around the same time as our f2f meeting Olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 3 January 2013

• Re: Attack, Hold, Decay using linearRampToValueAtTime Chris Wilson
• Re: [Audio WG] Move to GitHub? Chris Wilson
• Re: [Audio WG] Move to GitHub? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Audio WG] Move to GitHub? Marcos Caceres
• Attack, Hold, Decay using linearRampToValueAtTime Lonce Wyse

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

• Re: can we change the block size? Chris Rogers
• Re: DSP API experimental implementation Olivier Thereaux
• Re: DSP API experimental implementation Jussi Kalliokoski
• [Bug 19803] "Fingerprint" is unclear bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20376] Change fingerprint to id bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20364] Interface feedback bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20254] Add code examples bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20125] Should detail when exceptions are expected to be thrown bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19975] Promote data and timestamp onmessage/MIDIEvent, get rid of MIDIMessage altogether? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19770] Note that if the last event for an AudioParam is a setCurveValue event, the computed value after that event will be equal to the latest curve value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19769] Note that before the first automation event, the computed AudioParam value will be AudioParam.value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19768] Explicitly mention that the initial value of AudioParam.value will be defaultValue bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19764] Note in the spec that AudioParam.minValue/maxValue are merely informational bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Audio WG] Move to GitHub? Olivier Thereaux
• Re: [Audio WG] The group's Twitter account? Jory
• Re: [Audio WG] The group's Twitter account? Olivier Thereaux

Last message date: Saturday, 30 March 2013 22:06:08 UTC