Re: New "Web Audio Developers Community Group" created

Hello,

This is a reminder that we have created a community group for web audio
developers.

https://www.w3.org/community/audio-dev/



For more details, see quoted message, below.

Over time, we plan to be a little stricter about keeping this list on
topic (spec development, testing, issues and WG process) and re-route
other conversations about building with the web audio API (and web midi
API) to the community group. Questions such as "why is [feature] not
working in [implementation] are a bit more of a grey area, but I expect
most of them will belong more clearly in the CG.

I hope this distinction and its enforcement, make sense to all. Do ping me
individually if you think it is a mistake.

Best,
Olivier

On 11/02/2013 11:36, "Olivier Thereaux" <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>Some of you have missed the recent e-mail conversation[1] over the
>week-end: I am happy to announce that a new community group for web audio
>developers has been proposed, voted up, and created in the past couple of
>days.
>
>[1]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013JanMar/thread.html#ms

>g
>252
>
>
>
>The community group home page is at:
>https://www.w3.org/community/audio-dev/

>
>And its mailing-list, which every community group members automatically
>subscribe to, is public-audio-dev@w3.org (copied here).
>
>As the work of our working group progresses, we are likely to see an
>increase in the numbers of developers using the web audio (and web midi)
>specifications and early implementations, and it felt like a good time to
>create a place for developers to share, learn, and feed back to this
>working group.
>
>This new group will not greatly change the dynamics of the working group.
>
>I expect the WG will continue doing what it does, working on the specs,
>discussing technical issues on the documents and their underlying
>architecture. The CG, on the other hand, will be a good place for the "how
>do I do [X]" or "Should [Y] work the way it does in the [Z]
>implementation?". Having a forum for developers should also make it easier
>to gather feedback and issues as they are discovered - which should help
>the WG do its work better.
>
>The CG is not expected to work on any specification - although it might be
>a good place to start discussing tips which will eventually result in a
>tutorial document.
>
>Finally, let me note that WG members are NOT automatically added to the
>community group. You will have to go and join over at
>http://www.w3.org/community/audio-dev/ if you wish to be part of the CG.
>
>Best,
>Olivier



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 14:09:42 UTC