Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> Thanks. The basic approach sounds reasonable. I think instead of that
> setInputMixingMode method, it might be simpler to have ChannelCountMode and
> ChannelInterpretation and numberOfChannels be attributes on the node? Is
> there a need to have different interpretations per input port? Since only
> ChannelMergerNodes have more than one input port, I wouldn't have thought
> so...
>

Robert, thanks for having such a quick look.  Yes, it may be possible to do
as you suggest.  I'd considered the attributes, but thought it might be
nice to be able to set these values for a specific input.  I don't have any
specific use case where that would be necessary, but thought it might scale
better if we added nodes in the future where it potentially might make a
difference.

Chris


>
> Thanks,
> Rob
> --
> Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
> Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
> bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
> lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
> — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
> tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
>