On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Olivier Thereaux < Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > While (per w3c process anyway) it is not necessary that several browser > engines implement the spec, we will need two interoperable implementations > (libraries, engines, etc) before the spec can reach the more advanced > stages of standard maturity. > W3C process aside, if only one engine is going to implement the spec there's not much point in spending energy in a standards body writing the spec. I can't say that Mozilla would never implement the spec --- the future is uncertain, and a contributor might just appear with an implementation --- but the list of things we want to invest in that are higher priority is very, very long. I'm still a little puzzled by the fact that most of the energy in this group lately has been directed towards MIDI when it seems self-evident to me that Web Audio is far more important and still needs a lot of work. Rob -- Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave — just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” [Matthew 20:25-28]
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 02:59:21 UTC