Re: More details about channel up and down-mixing

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback, one other point I'd like to settle is the
>> naming.  I've been thinking that a .numberOfChannels attribute isn't the
>> right name, but instead should be .baseNumberOfChannels, or
>> .numberOfChannelsHint, or something like that.  For now, I propose the
>> attributes be:
>>
>> .channelCountMode
>> .channelInterpretation
>> .baseNumberOfChannels (which is ignored if channelCountMode=="max")
>>
>
> How about just "channelCount"?


Ok, now that you mention it, that seems pretty clean.  We just need to very
clearly document that this is a value used to compute the actual number of
channels, which in the case of "explicit" will be exactly this value...


>
>
> Rob
> --
> Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
> Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
> bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
> lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
> — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
> tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
>