Thursday, 30 June 2016
- Re: The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI | draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06
- Re: The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI | draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06
- RE: The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI | draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-02.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-02.txt
- Re: The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI | draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06
Tuesday, 28 June 2016
- The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI | draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site-00.txt
- Operational Considerations | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- probe - draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: comments on draft-west-first-party-cookies-07
Monday, 27 June 2016
- Re: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
- Re: cache-busting and query-string versioning
- Re: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
- Re: cache-busting and query-string versioning
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: cache-busting and query-string versioning
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: cache-busting and query-string versioning
- Re: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
Sunday, 26 June 2016
Saturday, 25 June 2016
Friday, 24 June 2016
- httpbis - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 96
- RE: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
- IPR disclosure for draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv-00.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Draft agenda for Berlin
- Call for Adoption: Secondary Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2
Thursday, 23 June 2016
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Fwd: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv
Wednesday, 22 June 2016
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: RFC6265 - Difference between RFC and implementation with regards to host-only-flag
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
- RE: RFC6265 - Difference between RFC and implementation with regards to host-only-flag
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: RFC6265 - Difference between RFC and implementation with regards to host-only-flag
- Re: comments on draft-west-first-party-cookies-07
- Re: questions on same-site cookies algorithm (draft-west-first-party-cookies)
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site-00.txt
Monday, 20 June 2016
- Re: SameSite=Strict cookies for a user entered URL
- Re: SameSite=Strict cookies for a user entered URL
Sunday, 19 June 2016
Friday, 17 June 2016
- comments on draft-west-first-party-cookies-07
- questions on same-site cookies algorithm (draft-west-first-party-cookies)
Thursday, 16 June 2016
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
Monday, 13 June 2016
Friday, 10 June 2016
Thursday, 9 June 2016
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4707)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4707)
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4707)
Wednesday, 8 June 2016
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest-01.txt
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Re: A proposal for Shared Dictionary Compression over HTTP
Tuesday, 7 June 2016
- Re: A proposal for Shared Dictionary Compression over HTTP
- Re: A proposal for Shared Dictionary Compression over HTTP
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
- Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP
Monday, 6 June 2016
Friday, 3 June 2016
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
Friday, 3 June 2016
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
- RFC6265 - Difference between RFC and implementation with regards to host-only-flag
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
Tuesday, 31 May 2016
Monday, 30 May 2016
Friday, 3 June 2016
- Call for Adoption: Two More Cookie Drafts / RFC6265bis status
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
Thursday, 2 June 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
- Re: Comments on httpbis-client-hints-01
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
- Re: constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
Tuesday, 31 May 2016
- Re: constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-01.txt
- Re: Nits and suggestions for draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest
- Re: Nits and suggestions for draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest
- Re: Nits and suggestions for draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest
- Re: Nits and suggestions for draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-05.txt
- Re: Nits and suggestions for draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest
- Key draft status
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4689)
- How to handle content-encoding
- Re: Call for Adoption: Same-site Cookies
Monday, 30 May 2016
Thursday, 26 May 2016
Tuesday, 24 May 2016
Monday, 23 May 2016
- Re: HSTS Misuse
- Re: HSTS Misuse
- Re: HSTS Misuse
- Re: HSTS Misuse
- Re: HSTS Misuse
- Re: HSTS Misuse
- Re: HSTS Misuse
Sunday, 22 May 2016
Saturday, 21 May 2016
Friday, 20 May 2016
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-01.txt
- constraining scheme (http vs https) on a connection
Tuesday, 17 May 2016
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-01.txt
- New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-01.txt
Saturday, 14 May 2016
Friday, 13 May 2016
Thursday, 12 May 2016
- BoF proposal
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
Wednesday, 11 May 2016
Tuesday, 10 May 2016
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Call for Adoption: ORIGIN Frame
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4689)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4689)
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4689)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame-00.txt
Monday, 9 May 2016
- Re: CoAP and new methods?
- Re: CoAP and new methods?
- CoAP and new methods?
- Re: MICE: specify record size inline, not in separate header
- RE: MICE: specify record size inline, not in separate header
- Re: MICE: specify record size inline, not in separate header
- MICE: specify record size inline, not in separate header
- Re: Post before acking settings?
Sunday, 8 May 2016
Saturday, 7 May 2016
Friday, 6 May 2016
Thursday, 5 May 2016
Friday, 6 May 2016
Thursday, 5 May 2016
- Re: Call for Adoption: Same-site Cookies
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4681)
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (4683)
- Re: Call for Adoption: ORIGIN Frame
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Call for Adoption: Same-site Cookies
- Re: Call for Adoption: ORIGIN Frame
- RE: Flow control for server push
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4682)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4682)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Same-site Cookies
- Call for Adoption: Same-site Cookies
- Re: Call for Adoption: ORIGIN Frame
- Call for Adoption: ORIGIN Frame
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4682)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4683)
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4683)
- Re: Composing signing and encryption
- Re: Composing signing and encryption
Tuesday, 3 May 2016
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4682)
- RE: Composing signing and encryption
- Re: Composing signing and encryption
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Composing signing and encryption
- Re: Flow control for server push
Monday, 2 May 2016
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Re: Flow control for server push
- Flow control for server push
Saturday, 30 April 2016
Friday, 29 April 2016
- Re: HTTP2 allowed ciphers
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4681)
- Re: HTTP2 allowed ciphers
- Re: HTTP2 allowed ciphers
- HTTP2 allowed ciphers
- Re: RUPTURE augers for adoption of draft-west-first-party-cookies
- Re: RUPTURE augers for adoption of draft-west-first-party-cookies
- Composing signing and encryption
Thursday, 28 April 2016
- RUPTURE augers for adoption of draft-west-first-party-cookies
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
Wednesday, 27 April 2016
- RE: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Re: Post before acking settings?
- Post before acking settings?
Tuesday, 26 April 2016
- [Errata Verified] RFC7234 (4674)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4666)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4674)
Thursday, 21 April 2016
- Re: "An Empirical Study of Web Cookies"
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4674)
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
Wednesday, 20 April 2016
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- RE: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
Tuesday, 19 April 2016
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: "An Empirical Study of Web Cookies"
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- RE: Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Is the response header "Upgrade: h2" allowed when TLS is used?
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- "An Empirical Study of Web Cookies"
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
Monday, 18 April 2016
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
Friday, 15 April 2016
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- RE: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: [Moderator Action] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
Thursday, 14 April 2016
- Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
Tuesday, 12 April 2016
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: [Moderator Action] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- RE: [Moderator Action] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
Thursday, 14 April 2016
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: RFC 7838 ALTSVC Frame
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: RFC 7838 ALTSVC Frame
- Re: RFC 7838 ALTSVC Frame
- Re: RFC 7838 ALTSVC Frame
- RFC 7838 ALTSVC Frame
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4665)
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
- comments on -httpbis-cookie-alone-00
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4666)
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4665)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4664)
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4664)
- Re: Sec-Scheme request header?
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Sec-Scheme request header?
Tuesday, 12 April 2016
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
Monday, 11 April 2016
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- RE: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- RE: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Cacheability of 421 (Misdirected Request)
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
Sunday, 10 April 2016
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
Saturday, 9 April 2016
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Alt-Svc Privacy Concerns
- Re: Alt-Svc across a domain?
Friday, 8 April 2016
- Re: Alt-Svc across a domain?
- Rough minutes from IETF95
- Re: Alt-Svc across a domain?
- Re: Alt-Svc across a domain?
- Alt-Svc across a domain?
- Re: Acknowledging pushed content
- RE: Acknowledging pushed content
- Re: Acknowledging pushed content
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Fwd: RFC 7838 on HTTP Alternative Services
Thursday, 7 April 2016
- Re: Acknowledging pushed content
- Re: Reminder: HTTP WG Meeting today
- Alt-Svc header for proxies
- Acknowledging pushed content
- Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
- Re: Last Call: <draft-alakuijala-brotli-08.txt> (Brotli Compressed Data Format) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-alakuijala-brotli-08.txt> (Brotli Compressed Data Format) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-alakuijala-brotli-08.txt> (Brotli Compressed Data Format) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-alakuijala-brotli-08.txt> (Brotli Compressed Data Format) to Informational RFC