- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 14:11:03 +1000
- To: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 May 2016 at 13:43, Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote: > How about just putting the record size at the start of the content, eg a > 4-byte prefix holding the record size in bytes as a big-endian unsigned int? I chose the header because you pretty much need one anyway to carry the proof. Including the size in the body is more space-efficient, but it makes the processing less regular because you have to read off 4 octets before proceeding to call fragment(body, rs+32). I'm not convinced that there's a clear win either way.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 04:11:31 UTC