Re: Post before acking settings? from Martin Thomson on 2016-04-27 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2016)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 01:23:56 +1000
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXxKLVvf88ZEpT3u-BZXS9yC+DpA8D563GOa9DGh+we7Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 28 April 2016 at 00:57, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>  It would actually be a bit more optimal to aggregate multiple SETTINGS
> and send back in the ACK a copy of the last values being ACK'd so the
> sender can know what state the other end is up to receiving. (eg. TCP
> seqno ACK).

A hash might be cheaper.  A nonce is cheaper still.

Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 15:24:29 UTC