Re: Post before acking settings?

On 28 April 2016 at 00:57, Amos Jeffries <> wrote:
>  It would actually be a bit more optimal to aggregate multiple SETTINGS
> and send back in the ACK a copy of the last values being ACK'd so the
> sender can know what state the other end is up to receiving. (eg. TCP
> seqno ACK).

A hash might be cheaper.  A nonce is cheaper still.

Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 15:24:29 UTC