- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:27:52 +1000
- To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Done: https://github.com/mnot/I-D/commit/b2761011291677b > On 31 May 2016, at 5:12 PM, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-05-31 14:24 GMT+09:00 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>: >> >>> On 15 May 2016, at 1:43 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From small to large: >>> >>> Nit: >>> 2. If "W" and "V" are equal, continue to the next "V". >>> >>> This should be next "W", I think. >> >> There is no next W... >> >> >>> I think that Q would be better encoded as a series of 0 bits followed >>> by a 1 bit. The reason I say that is that it is (marginally) easier >>> to generate the values then by masking in the R value in the right >>> place in a freshly calloc'd piece of memory. >> >> I'm not fussed; Kazuho? > > I do not mind either way, so it might be better to change it now. > >> >>> This document really needs to describe what the contents of the cache >>> digest are, and to describe how to decode the cache digest. Without >>> defining what it means to receive and decode this information, this >>> specification almost says nothing at all. >> >> Whatever happened to "left as an exercise to the reader?" >> >> :) >> >> Yes, we do. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >> > > > > -- > Kazuho Oku -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 07:28:21 UTC