- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:08:07 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Well, they've got a separate registry for methods, so I'm not too concerned. I'd be a little happier if they didn't seem to justify everything they did in terms of HTTP. Cheers, > On 9 May 2016, at 5:00 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see that the core working group has adopted this work: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-etch-00 > > This defines new methods for CoAP, which is (was?) very much *like* HTTP. > > The new methods are: > > FETCH, which looks like the proposed SEARCH in that it acts as a safe, > idempotent retrieval. It is different in that responses that are > cacheable by default AND the request body forms part of the cache key. > (I think that I got that right.) > > iPATCH, which is like PATCH, but idempotent. > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 07:08:36 UTC