- From: Remy Lebeau <remy@lebeausoftware.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:04:55 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57115777.4040001@lebeausoftware.org>
What you say is true, but you are only focusing on the *second half* of the Content-Range value, ignoring the *first half*. Here is the full definition: Content-Range = byte-content-range / other-content-range byte-content-range = bytes-unit SP ( byte-range-resp / unsatisfied-range ) byte-range-resp = byte-range "/" ( complete-length / "*" ) byte-range = first-byte-pos "-" last-byte-pos unsatisfied-range = "*/" complete-length complete-length = 1*DIGIT other-content-range = other-range-unit SP other-range-resp other-range-resp = *CHAR If the range is satisfied, the *complete-length* can be "*", but the *byte-range-resp* cannot be "*". If the range is unsatisfied, the *byte-range-resp* must be "*", and the *complete-length* cannot be "*". Remy Lebeau Lebeau Software On 4/15/2016 1:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > That is incorrect. See RFC7233, Sec 4.2: > > For byte ranges, a sender SHOULD indicate the complete length of the > representation from which the range has been extracted, unless the > complete length is unknown or difficult to determine. An asterisk > character ("*") in place of the complete-length indicates that the > representation length was unknown when the header field was > generated. > > The following example illustrates when the complete length of the > selected representation is known by the sender to be 1234 bytes: > > Content-Range: bytes 42-1233/1234 > > and this second example illustrates when the complete length is > unknown: > > Content-Range: bytes 42-1233/* > > There is no need for another range unit. > > ....Roy >
Received on Friday, 15 April 2016 21:05:36 UTC