Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4689)

On 2016-05-10 10:05, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> This is not an errata; it is a suggestion for a technical change in the document, and needs to be discussed by the working group.
> If you'd like to make suggestions, the best place to do so is the issues list for this document set:
> Regards,


Furthermore, I disagree with that change. The purpose of the ABNF 
production *in the HTTP spec* is to define how field values are parsed, 
not how potentially invalid charset names are to be detected.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 08:29:59 UTC