- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:27:07 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, quae@daurnimator.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2016-05-10 10:05, Mark Nottingham wrote: > HOLD FOR UPDATE. > > This is not an errata; it is a suggestion for a technical change in the document, and needs to be discussed by the working group. > > If you'd like to make suggestions, the best place to do so is the issues list for this document set: > https://github.com/httpwg/http11bis/issues > > Regards, +1 Furthermore, I disagree with that change. The purpose of the ABNF production *in the HTTP spec* is to define how field values are parsed, not how potentially invalid charset names are to be detected. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 08:29:59 UTC