- From: Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 20:45:45 -0300
- To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Cc: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKC-DJiO1=AckR9fEt==6OPVaC7V5Kp=un+j8wMTb0XXrHt2Zw@mail.gmail.com>
I'd agree. I also think that without a better Domain Boundaries solution that is much better than what we have today this has the potential to make a big mess. In my experience, there seems to be a wide mixture of origins within the domain which *aren't* served from the same infrastructure. eg, it's very common to use a mix of different CDNs or hosting providers for different origins within a domain. This is even before you get to things like "support.example.com" and "investor-relations.example.com" which might be CNAME'd over to third-party SaaS providers. Erik On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> It is common for web sites to serve content from a variety of different >> origins within the same domain. For example, www.example.com, >> accounts.example.com, images.example.com. A single page view may require >> loading resources from several such origins. (Tricks like domain sharing >> can exacerbate this proliferation of origins.) It would be great if the >> service had some way to tell the client, "All of my domains can use this >> alternative service". What would folks thinks of an include-subdomains >> parameter in the Alt-Svc value? If such a parameter were present in an >> Alt-Svc advertisement, a client could use this advertisement to apply to >> any sub-domain of the origin that the client does not already have an >> alternative for. This would avoid the need to discover the alternatives >> individually. >> >> > the server can send, unsolicited, on stream 0 an altsvc frame for each > origin it wants to provide alt-svc info for (the connection needs to be > authoritative for those origins, of course). > > yesterday's discussion of adding certificates to an established connection > would make that more powerful. > > I would encourage h1 servers to update to h2 to get this feature :) > > -P > > > >> Cheers, >> >> Ryan >> > >
Received on Friday, 8 April 2016 23:46:12 UTC