Re: Working Group Last Call: Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP from Martin Thomson on 2016-06-08 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2016)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:33:42 +1000
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWoAYFBuLVeeDSHiqLQJxUnEJ+buMznbEFXtjGT3BqCEA@mail.gmail.com>

On 8 June 2016 at 17:18, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> Why the pick between them? isn't there an ongoing WG intention to make
> field-values more consistently a generic:
>
>  token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string )

>From the draft:

  Encryption = #encryption_params
  encryption_params = [ parameter *( ";" parameter ) ]

>From RFC 7231, which the draft cites:

   parameter = token "=" ( token / quoted-string )

Good enough?

Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 07:41:47 UTC