On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Cory Benfield wrote: >> Stefan and Daniel point out that the server uses the Upgrade header to >> "advertise support" for h2. > > I don’t think that’s really a good way to read this section of RFC 7230. I'd like to point out that my argument in that report was when the client in question originally took the Upgrade: response header as some sort of instruction of what to do next, while I'm saying Upgrade: in a response header is only an advertisement for support - not an instruction to do anything. I said that disregarding the actual protocol it mentioned. I think Upgrade: should probably say h2c as a h2 in there begs the question what that really means... -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 16:01:04 UTC