- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:40:02 +0200
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ylafon@w3.org, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mnot@mnot.net
- Cc: amichai2@amichais.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2016-04-13 10:41, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7233, > "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4664 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Amichai Rothman <amichai2@amichais.net> > > Section: 4.4 > > Original Text > ------------- > The 416 (Range Not Satisfiable) status code indicates that none of > the ranges in the request's Range header field (Section 3.1) overlap > the current extent of the selected resource or that the set of ranges > requested has been rejected due to invalid ranges or an excessive > request of small or overlapping ranges. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The 416 (Range Not Satisfiable) status code indicates that none of > the ranges in the request's Range header field (Section 3.1) overlap > the current extent of the selected representation or that the set of > ranges requested has been rejected due to invalid ranges or an excessive > request of small or overlapping ranges. > ... I agree that "representation" would have been the correct term here. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 09:40:53 UTC