Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-http-jfv

On 2016-06-23 02:04, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> We've sat on this CfV for a while, mostly because we had other work in flight, some of it more urgent.
>
> However, I'm seeing an increasing number of specs outside the WG depend on this spec, which both validates the approach, and increases the urgency of shipping it.
>
> So, let's go ahead and adopt it. Julian, can you add it to the repo, please?

Done. Should I also submit a -00 draft?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 19:13:07 UTC