- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 11:40:28 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Darshak Thakore <d.thakore@cablelabs.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12 May 2016 at 10:59, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > 1. Changing the 'bytes' range-unit to allow this use case > 2. Minting a new range-unit I suggested a third option: work around the limitation. Was there a reason that isn't feasible? (There are probably many, but I saw none offered.)
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 01:40:57 UTC