Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-06.txt from Martin Thomson on 2016-06-23 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2016)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:38:07 +1000
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU2d2EHo7csMAWrL=YTtJwfO5wuC7bvDEDngSOjWhP=dw@mail.gmail.com>

On 24 June 2016 at 07:44, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
> But "tls-ports" at the same time tells me what ports I should accept referrals to *without* requiring authentication.

So you are saying that any port is OK if you can authenticate the
server.  That's true.  Is this as simple as removing the example, or
do you think we need to say that the two members are mutually
exclusive?

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 23:38:43 UTC