- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:24:54 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
> On 15 May 2016, at 1:43 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From small to large: > > Nit: > 2. If "W" and "V" are equal, continue to the next "V". > > This should be next "W", I think. There is no next W... > I think that Q would be better encoded as a series of 0 bits followed > by a 1 bit. The reason I say that is that it is (marginally) easier > to generate the values then by masking in the R value in the right > place in a freshly calloc'd piece of memory. I'm not fussed; Kazuho? > This document really needs to describe what the contents of the cache > digest are, and to describe how to decode the cache digest. Without > defining what it means to receive and decode this information, this > specification almost says nothing at all. Whatever happened to "left as an exercise to the reader?" :) Yes, we do. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 05:25:22 UTC