Saturday, 1 November 2003
Friday, 31 October 2003
- Counterproposal for service references
- PROPOSAL: Short-cut syntax for in-out and in-only patterns
- RE: RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Intermediaries
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
Thursday, 30 October 2003
- Re: Attributes in WSDL
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styl es
- PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Attributes in WSDL
- Re: Extensions and profiles
- [rev 2] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- Extensions and profiles
- Completion of AI from attributes task force
- Re: [rev 1] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: [rev 1] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Regrets for Telcon Oct 30, 2003
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
Wednesday, 29 October 2003
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: http binding
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: http binding
- Re: http binding
- RE: Agenda, 30 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: http binding
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: http binding
- Re: http binding
- RE: http binding
- RE: http binding
- Re: http binding
- Re: http binding
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: http binding
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: http binding
- RE: http binding
- Re: http binding
- Re: http binding
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: Agenda, 30 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Agenda, 30 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
Tuesday, 28 October 2003
- RE: parameter order
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: parameter order
- Re: parameter order
- Re: parameter order
- [rev 1] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- RPC 80/20 split (was: Re: RPC Style Issues (3))
- Re: parameter order
- parameter order (was: Re: RPC Style Issues (3))
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- quoting properly (was: Re: RPC Style Issues (3))
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- http binding
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Regrets for 30 October 2003 telcon
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Minutes 23 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
- Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
Monday, 27 October 2003
- RE: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- spec part1 update complete
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- [rev 0] Agenda, 3-5 Nov 2003 WSDesc FTF
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: writing up faults and q about fault rules
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
Sunday, 26 October 2003
Monday, 27 October 2003
Sunday, 26 October 2003
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
Saturday, 25 October 2003
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
Friday, 24 October 2003
Saturday, 25 October 2003
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
Friday, 24 October 2003
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
Thursday, 23 October 2003
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- minutes for yesterday's call?
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
Friday, 24 October 2003
Thursday, 23 October 2003
Friday, 24 October 2003
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- RE: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
Thursday, 23 October 2003
Friday, 24 October 2003
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- RE: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: RPC Style Issues (3)
Thursday, 23 October 2003
- Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
Friday, 24 October 2003
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?]
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Re: What does WSDL describe?
Thursday, 23 October 2003
- RE: What does WSDL describe?
- Features and Properties musings
- RE: Minutes 16 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- What does WSDL describe?
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inli ne schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inli ne schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
Wednesday, 22 October 2003
- Agenda, 23 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: Minutes, 24 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Minutes 16 Oct 2003 WS Desc telcon
Tuesday, 21 October 2003
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
Monday, 20 October 2003
- Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- PROPOSAL: Drop interface/operation/(input|output)/@headers
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
Sunday, 19 October 2003
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
Saturday, 18 October 2003
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
Friday, 17 October 2003
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Re: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- RE: Can one inline schema import definitions from a second inline schema?
- Web Services Privacy Issues in WSDL and SOAP
Thursday, 16 October 2003
Wednesday, 15 October 2003
Tuesday, 14 October 2003
- Agenda, 16 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: Three patterns using the ruleset "Message Triggers Fault"
- Minutes: 9 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
Friday, 10 October 2003
Thursday, 9 October 2003
- Re: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
- RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
- RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
- Re: Wording of Part1 2.3.1.1 Operation Style
- RE: Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
- Wording of Part1 2.3.1.1 Operation Style
- Problem with "Fault Replaces Message" rule
- Re: Three patterns using the ruleset "Message Triggers Fault"
- RPC Style Issues (3)
- RPC Style Issues Part (2)
- RPC Style Issues Part (1)
Wednesday, 8 October 2003
Tuesday, 7 October 2003
Friday, 3 October 2003
- Re: revised fault proposal
- Fw: cvs commits to 2002/ws/desc
- revised fault proposal
- RE: proposal for faults
- Re: examples in spec?
- RE: examples in spec?
- Draft minutes of Oct 2 telcon
- RE: examples in spec?
- RE: examples in spec?
- Re: examples in spec?
- Re: examples in spec?
- Re: examples in spec?
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
Thursday, 2 October 2003
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- examples in spec?
- Re: proposal for faults
- RE: on "wsdlLocation"
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- RE: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- RE: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components
- RE: proposal for faults
- RE: proposal for faults
- RE: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components
- Re: pattern URIs
- RE: on "wsdlLocation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- RE: pattern URIs
- RE: proposal for faults
- RE: proposal for faults
- RE: proposal for faults
- RE: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components
Wednesday, 1 October 2003
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web se rv ices
- Regrets for 10/02/2003 telcon
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: pattern URIs
- Re: pattern URIs (was: Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF)
- RE: comments on Appendix E
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web se rv ices