- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:33:37 +0600
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> writes: > > WSDL is currently committed to an "interface/operation" model. I'm > asking that it be augmented to support alternative models such as the > one Savas describes. "operation" in WSDL 2.0 is a way of grouping together a set of messages. There is *no* semantic beyond that any more. Can you explain what the difference between that and Savas' model is please? Please use something non-committal like "foo" for <operation> so that we can talk rationally without having mental connotations on what these words mean. Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:32:40 UTC