RE: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0

I'm guessing this additional rule is required for something not passing SOAP or even XML, e.g. REST ?

Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: 21 October 2003 04:10
To: Umit Yalcinalp
Cc: WS Description List
Subject: Re: Proposal: Uniqueness on the Wire Requirement for WSDL 2.0



On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:25:37PM -0400, Umit Yalcinalp wrote:
> There are three different ways of solving this problem that I can think of:

I think those are fine for the tunneled use of Web services, but none
address the needs of systems which want to reuse the application
semantics of any underlying application protocol.

So I'd suggest adding a fourth option, which is really orthogonal
to the others as it supports a different by complementary use;

0. Use the operation name(s) provided by the underlying application
protocol as the effective operation.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2003 06:57:36 UTC