RE: RPC Style Issues (3) from Jeffrey Schlimmer on 2003-10-31 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from October 2003)

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:01:04 -0800
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>, "Umit Yalcinalp" <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8039D85CE@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.mi>

> From: Jacek Kopecky
> 
> Otherwise, not having the distinction doesn't harm interop.

Don't forget that the RPC style is not needed for interop since it does
not affect the messages that are exchanged. It is a means to convey
intended programming model and should be designed to be sufficient for
that purpose.

Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 12:02:43 UTC