RE: What does WSDL describe?

Anne,

> 
> There's another thread that's asking whether we should change the
element
> name "operation" to something like"messageExchange". Personally, I
don't
> think it really matters what we call it (although I do have a
preference
> for shorter names over longer names). The purpose of the element
currently
> known as "operation" is to define the input, output, and/or fault
messages
> that get exchanged in the course of a specific node-to-node
interaction.
> (So maybe "interaction" would placate the opponents of "operation"? --
> Whatever!).


What about

<interactions>
  <exchange>
    <input message="" />
  </exchange>
  <exchange>
    <input message="" />
    <output message="" />
  </exchange>
<interactions>

Yet something else to consider :-)

.savas.