- From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:33:51 -0800
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:33:57 UTC
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >Hi Mark, > >Thanks for your explanation. > > > >>Consider the data "12345", suitably SOAP-ized. If that is sent >>to a service, and we get a successful response back, what are the >>possible interpretations of that success? >> >> > >I think we can stop right here - the possible interpretations are >out of scope for WSDL. Some may want to interpret it as "processed" >while others may want to interpret it as "success." Not WSDL's role >to pick one of those interpretations as "it." > >WSDL is pretty damn lame really - it just says a document conforming >to this schema goes in and another conforming to that schema comes >out. That's it. *Really* lame. :-(. > +1. Yes, it is pretty darn lame, but does it have to be ? > >Going beyond that is not the job for WSDL. I thought that's what >the semantic Web was about, but I really don't grok SW stuff yet. > >All IMO, of course. > >Sanjiva. > > > > > -- Umit Yalcinalp Consulting Member of Technical Staff ORACLE Phone: +1 650 607 6154 Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:33:57 UTC