- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 02:18:49 +0600
- To: "'WS Description List'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Umit Yalcinalp" <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com> writes: > I point out that you might have missed the thread if indeed your desire > is to talk about parameterorder. No, that's not my desire - I was just pointing out that the parameterOrder solution that you used in WSDL 1.1 (I'm assuming you did do that to solve this problem in WSDL 1.1) seems like a viable approach now too. I missed last week's call, but the messages you pointed to are not in the space of a parameterOrder attribute. I'd rather not have it, but if we're going down that road I'd rather re-use the old approach rather than creating something new which doesn't even support multi-return type scenarios. Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 15:16:59 UTC