- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:26:18 -0500
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Hi Sanjiva, On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:04:33PM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I think we can stop right here - the possible interpretations are > out of scope for WSDL. Some may want to interpret it as "processed" > while others may want to interpret it as "success." Not WSDL's role > to pick one of those interpretations as "it." > > WSDL is pretty damn lame really - it just says a document conforming > to this schema goes in and another conforming to that schema comes > out. That's it. *Really* lame. :-(. Do you have any examples of WSDL that describe services that work in this manner? Perhaps that would help ground this discussion. Thanks. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 13:26:12 UTC