- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:57:53 +0600
- To: "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Thanks Mike - I think you captured it perfectly! Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org> To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:29 AM Subject: Re: What does WSDL describe? > > > On Tuesday, Oct 28, 2003, at 21:13 America/Detroit, Mark Baker wrote: > > > > > I think you need to re-read my proposal, Sanjiva. I'm totally > > against renaming too. I'm saying we need *both* "operation" and > > "exchange". > > > > > And the WG members are saying, if I am seeing this correctly from a > distance, that WSDL is not committed to either an "interface/option > model" or a "state exchange model." Terminology aside, it's just about > messages and interaction patterns; those messages may describe > operations or state exchange, but those semantics are outside the scope > of WSDL.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 21:56:07 UTC